Peer review should not be anonymous
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
I-14: Assisted Reproduction and Religion What Consideration Should Be and Should Not Be Relevant,
Several important issues are pertinent to an ethical discussion of the new technology today grouped under the name Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART). This is a moral imperative because each of us must decide what is to be considered ethically acceptable in assisted reproduction. Reflecting on the ethical dimension of ‘creating’ a new human life can play a major role in ensuring that in eac...
متن کاملShould Employers Be Permitted not to Hire Smokers? A Review of US Legal Provisions
Background Increasingly, healthcare and non-healthcare employers prohibit or penalize the use of tobacco products among current and new employees in the United States. Despite this trend, and for a range of different reasons, around half of states currently legally protect employees from being denied positions, or having employment contracts terminated, due to tobacco use. Methods We undertoo...
متن کاملMRS Shimming: An Important Point Which Should not be Ignored
Introduction: Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a well-known device for analyzing the biological fluids metabolically. Obtaining accurate and reliable information via MRS needs a homogeneous magnetic field in order to provide well-defined peaks and uniform water suppression. There are lots of reasons which can disturb the magnetic field homogeneity which can be corrected by a proc...
متن کاملWhy scientific publications should be anonymous
Numerous studies have revealed biases within the scientific communication system and across all scientific fields. For example, already prominent researchers receive disproportional credit compared to their (almost) equally qualified colleagues – because of their prominence. However, none of those studies has offered a solution as to how to decrease the incidence of these biases. In this paper ...
متن کاملPeer to Peer Edge Caches Should be Free
Bulk-data peer to peer systems have been promoted as reducing the cost of content distribution. Unfortunately, this isn’t generally true. Rather, bulk-data P2P shifts the costs of delivery from the content provider to the ISPs or content recipients. A very simple economic model of content delivery shows how this occurs and that, under some conditions, P2P can grossly magnify costs. Even with lo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ
سال: 2003
ISSN: 0959-8138,1468-5833
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7393.824/b